Do you think it really doesn’t train on your data?

I’ve been using it and it looks good so far, I just ask simple questions and never let the context get too big.

It’s good that it doesn’t require login, just open and ask something.

  • someone@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    They constantly measure DomRect using javascript, which is a unique hardware-based metric that can be used to track individual users.

    Imagine the cost of running duck.ai. What exactly is the revenue that it brings in?

    Of course, if it were some honeypot, using DomRects to track users (and DomRect is not protected by Tor Browser or Mullvad Browser etc), well then it doesn’t really matter if it’s not bringing in much revenue since it’s value is in being a honeypot.

    Yes, DomRect can be used legitimately in coding without tracking users… but why does ddg need to use this when they know that it CAN be used to track users and users have no way to audit the servers?

    It’s really interesting they measure DomRect and not Canvas when privacy-aware users often block canvas fingerprinting but don’t block DomRect.

    It’s sus

  • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    It needs to PISS OFF.

    It should be off by default. As it’s set up right now, DDG settings don’t keep on privacy respecting browsers due to cookies being cleared regularly. Since their AI is on by default, that means it regularly gets shoved in your face.

  • MolochHorridus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t want AI anywhere near my daily drivers. If I want to use AI it needs to be siloed and unable to access any of my data unless I explicitly feed something into it.

  • glitching@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I use it reluctantly and only to un-fuck the fucked up search. if there were a good search engine I wouldn’t use the thing.

  • CallMeAl (Not AI)@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    Everything you type in the chat box is sent to the LLM provider but they get Duck Duck Go’s IP instead of yours.

    So if you type personal things its mostly just like typing them directly to ChatGPT. However, with duck.ai your IP, Browser info, Location (if shared), etc is seen by Duck Duck Go instead of OpenAI.

    I don’t think DuckDuckGo is lying when they say that they don’t use your chats to train models. However, that leaves plenty for OpenAI and Duck Duck Go to do with your chats, like building shadow profiles.

    I suggest that if you want to be anonymous to Duck Duck Go, then use duck.ai via vpn or tor. Always assume the content of your chat session is being logged by the LLM provider.

      • CallMeAl (Not AI)@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Like a dossier which identifies you only by some ID which is used to compile data about you but never includes your direct personal info (name, email, home address, mobile number) so they don’t have to tell you or ever delete it, even under laws like GDPR.

        • dontblink@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          How can they tie it to me tho? Or use it against me? Especially if behind ddg “proxy”

  • James R Kirk@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    From ArsTechnica:

    According to DuckDuckGo, chats on the service are anonymized, with metadata and IP address removed to prevent tracing back to individuals. The company states that chats are not used for AI model training, citing its privacy policy and terms of use.

    “We have agreements in place with all model providers to ensure that any saved chats are completely deleted by the providers within 30 days,” says DuckDuckGo, “and that none of the chats made on our platform can be used to train or improve the models.”

    So there is some trust involved, but I’m inclined to believe DDG.

  • SGforce
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s a frontend. Of course they don’t, it’s not their AI.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    There is no such thing as “AI”.

    But I appreciate the generated summaries of search results. Sometimes they miss the point of my search, but they’re often quicker than searching through the webpage results.

    I don’t know why people get so mad about it.

    • ElectricMachman@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The generative summaries have the potential to take clicks / visitors away from the sites they’re from. I’ve seen reports of smaller sites being at risk of closing down as a result, and if there are no sites to summarise…

    • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because of rampant hallucinations, yet people taking them as gospel. Not to mention the energy cost for no real benefit

  • rozodru@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s fairly bare bones in all honesty. It does sum up initial searches fairly well but beyond that you’re not going to get much, if anything, out of it. Asking it follow up questions regarding a search is more miss than hit.

    It has provided me decent initial results when I’m searching for some random linux question/solution but clarifying or expanding on initial results is useless.