I’ve just read about Tidal Upload, a new service they offer (they did email me about it)

At first I thought “Oh, no! Anyone can upload directly now?! Tidal will be swamped by AI !!!”. But as per their rules, tracks uploaded directly get no revenue, so that takes care of that, I guess.

Turns out that anything you upload through this new function can be listened without a Tidal subscription, so in all likelihood this is an attempt by Tidal to lure in some friends and family of indie artists. Musicians get free storage, “free advertising” (via their music being searchable on Tidal without distribution fees) and get to share their music with their friends without ads getting in the way as they do on YouTube (presumably; as of yet) while Tidal potentially gets new subscribers.

I still feel like somehow someone will try to abuse this, though. How do you feel about it?

I’m also thinking at some point they might start playing ads before Tidal Upload tracks to cut their losses from the storage costs and that snowballs from there…

https://support.tidal.com/hc/en-us/articles/26542012438673-TIDAL-Upload

  • scytale@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I guess it’s a way to corner some of the indie artist market, since it will only be available on Tidal. Unlike the current distribution model where you upload to one distributor and they propagate it to all streaming platforms. It might not be as enticing for people who want maximum exposure of their music though.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    It could still get swamped by spammers uploading ads.

    …It might not though. Spamming seems to be a bandwagon kind of activity, and this may simply not catch on, in lieu of more popular, lower hanging fruit.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Oh, and on this:

    from the storage costs

    Music storage is dirt cheap these days.

    As a random example, the Gorillaz discography, as lossless ALAC, is apparently ~4 Gigabytes on my disk.

    In one server like this:

    SuperMicro X14

    That’s like the full discography of 350,000 artists.

    Of course its a bit more complicated. For example, I suppose they gotta cache popular uploads, but still. The storage part is not hard for them to do as a rounding error in their budget.

    The expensive part is coding the interface, backend software, sliding this into the streaming infrastructure they already have, and stuff like that.