• grteOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That seems to back up what I said? 51 percent, a majority, don’t see any reason to continue on with what they see as an outdated institution.

    • schmidtster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If it doesn’t affect anything, why the sentiment “we have to get rid of it”, arguably those would be the people that think they still hold power.

      And even more than that amount see it as a positive….

      • grteOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We have to get rid of it because it’s entirely unjustifiable that a ‘royal’ family exists regardless of the actual power that they wield. We’ve long moved past the concept of divine right of kings, there is no ethical basis for this institution. Those are the grounds on which it must be got rid of. That they are powerless money sucks that do nothing for us is just the cherry on top.

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          … the monarchy holds no power, parliament does.

          This is the exact thing I was talking about, say with me, the monarchy has NO POWER and is nothing more than a figure head. They’ve moved past the divine right of the “king” decades ago.

          And Canada pays zero money to the monarchy, so they a rent a money suck either.

          So circling back to people no understanding… thanks for proving my point explicitly!

          • grteOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Right, so time to get rid of the pointless institution. Why is this family receiving state money when there is no justification for them to be doing so? Bye bye, time to get a real job.

            • schmidtster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              We don’t pay them though….

              Thanks for proving my point mate!

              It would cost us money to remove them while it costs us nothing for them to sit there.

                • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Most of those costs would be there regardless of the moncarchy.

                  Still have to upkeep historical buildings, still need to accommodate nationals among other costs.

                  And we don’t know what the other option could cost, it may cost more since we don’t have established accommodations.

                  It’s not as simple as you seem to think, those costs wouldn’t just go away….

                  • grteOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Well as I said previously, the money is just the cherry on top. The actual basis for getting rid of the monarchy is that it’s an institution with no real legitimacy. Our figurehead is a charlatan.