• jcit878@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the reference to collars was more a hypothetical in the article as the author was challenging the bunker dudes how would they ensure the people keeping them safe remained loyal, and that none of them considered anything like “treat them like people before the cataclism”, it didn’t even occur to them at all, instead they proposed a bunch of more controlling measures, which included “disciplinary collars”

    • Chetzemoka@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      They can buy themselves a few years at best without a functioning supply chain. We all depend on society, no matter how much they like to deny it

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The ultra-rich will still be dependent on their retinues of loyal followers, whose loyalties will of course be tested by the collapse of civilization. Unless their retinues are robots, of course.

      • Final Remix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        robots

        That’s it! We take all the rich and politicians and stick 'em in “FSD” enabled teslas for a while. The problem will solve itself.

    • floofloof
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      These billionaires imagine they’re rich because they’re brilliant, not because they’re the biggest assholes and lucky (and born rich). They overestimate their independence from all the people and other creatures that actually make the planet and human society work. Once they get to their bunkers or their Mars outpost, perhaps reality will gradually get through to them. They can’t escape this using bunkers, rockets and weapons.