• Tavarin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      No it cannot, that’s not communism. China is as communist as North Korea is democratic. Just because a country calls itself something does not make it that thing.

      • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Countries can have multiple different systems in place. China for example, is an authoritarian communist state.

        • Tavarin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Communism by definition cannot be authoritarian. So no, China is not an authoritarian communist state, it’s just a an authoritarian state.

          The only way for China to be communist is to give all people direct communal ownership of goods and services.

          • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Communism can be authoritarian, though, as it has been in history.

            What’s your basis for this definition?

            • Tavarin
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              No it cannot because communism by definition must be a classless society. If there is a group above others that controls the state, it is no longer classless, and therefore not communist.

              And you know, the name derives from communal, so no communal ownership = no communism.

                • PugJesus@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Generally speaking Marxists and those operating on schools of thought derived or related to Marxism use Marx’s original definition of ‘Communism’ as the end goal of a stateless society, with a socialist state as the necessary intermediate point. This unfortunately gets muddled when people say “I’m a Communist” (meaning I’m forming a socialist state to ACHIEVE communism) and just end up forming a socialist (or ‘socialist’) state.