• jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    snicker you’re citing incorrect data. You should be looking at how many wind up working in people that dont work in mice to make the argument you’re trying to make.

    You’re also ignoring things that we outright reject because the side effects on mice are horrific.

    And finally way to cherry pick your dataset.

      • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        congrats on having most unrelated comment of the day. in no way was i taking a position on the morality of animal testing. just the technical aspect of the current methods being used.

        you’ll note that their little quoted pamplet isnt talking about the morality of the use just making the completely incorrect claims that the animal models are useless. which is just plain incorrect.

        until we figure out how to create synthetic human organs they’re the best method for testing new medical procedures.

          • Jim East@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Descartes should have just said “cogito ergo sum” and published his coordinate system and quit while he was ahead.