• Synthead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I don’t want the YouTube channel to be shut down, I couldn’t imagine that YouTube is the only place this exists and it’s the only place it can be hosted.

    • SeedyOne
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’d be surprised to realize what a pain in the ass it is to host a good deal of videos. There’s more lost content (shows, movies and commercials) combined than archived data that exists today. Media was simply not kept and storage written over. Sadly, we’re going to keep losing it.

      • Synthead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It depends on what you’re trying to do. If you want a social media site based around videos with a variety of features with high traffic, then sure. If you’re just archiving stuff for the sake of it, then you can simply host static content.

        There are also many other places to store stuff than YouTube.