• Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I assume it’s relatively clean, but not safe to drink

        Edit: I don’t think the replies are really getting it. This sounds like a great use of minimally processed water with relatively small risk. It’s much better to use this water than potable water for the same purpose, assuming water is going to be used no matter what.

        • qyron@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          Depends on the amount of treatment steps it undergoes.

          Standard procedure is aimed at just removing solid debris and organic matter, to return clarified and chemically balanced water to nature, with no excess nutrients that could feed algae in water streams.

          From that point forward, it is just a question of how far the treatment can be taken.

          For reuse for cleaning, washing, etc? Maybe it just gets a minute dosage of sodium hypocloride.

          Highly sensible areas, like beaches or lakes? UV treatment, maybe followed by micro filtering. Extreme scenarios? Reverse osmosis.

          If the protocols in place are strong, it’s safe.

        • MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          I always assumed the same… Turns out, a wastewater plant and treatment plant for drinking water look a lot more alike than I thought.

          I’m pretty sure you could drink it, you’d just want to do it far enough away that you don’t have to think about where it came from.

        • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Which means a leak would be “relatively clean” water getting all over the place.

          Just doesn’t sound like a good idea.

          Also, are we talking using this water in chiller cooling towers, like most buildings use? So essentially heating that “relatively clean” liquid to about 100° or so (you know, a temp that microbes just love), and releasing it to the atmosphere.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    As someone that works in waste water: do it.

    The company I worked for made a show of signing a partnership with a beer maker to supply them with water to create a unique batch.

    The water had to be mixed with regular water in order to balance out the profile, as the treated water had underwent an aditional step to make it safe for consumption (UV treatment and micro filtering); it was closer to filtered water than anything else.

    Odourless, colourless and tasteless.

    Who tried it, said the beer came out just fine.

    Using treated waste water for cooling datacenters would be trivial. And cheap.

    • dogma11@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      As someone that works in a data center, we use an absolute shit ton of reclaimed water for evaporative cooling. 😀

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nice! Good to know.

        But why have an evaporative cooling system and not use a system similar to internal combustion engines, with a closed circuit system? It would be more economic.

        But I wouldn’t want to have to replace the gasket if it broke!

  • floo@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Enjoy your superheated poo water! Surely that will cause no problems, lol!