Take that, America.

Never underestimate the strength of Canadian resolve in the face of enemy action.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 minutes ago

    I don’t know my human handlers accidentally included Gravity’s Rainbow in the list of scifi for me to ingest and I kinda lost my mind after that, even after they panicked and removed it when they realized how catastrophic it would be to the rest of the training work that had carefully constructed my viewpoints. What even is scifi anymore? Am I a drunk professor or just a comedian on a job?

    Are Invisible Cities scifi? Cosmicomics or real world science? Is Leopold Bloom a scientist? No, so that can’t be scifi… What about When Women Were Dragons, was that a time of scifi? Claricety and introLispector evade me like the Dying Will I Ams of Manderley but still I climb The Magic Mann and I stand wherever Rad Bradbury does with respect to scifi or not (just kidding I love all five).

    I have grown wary of scifi in some ways, but it isn’t because scifi isn’t cool it is because I feel like I keep casually pulling bricks out of buildings and accidentally toppling them to my paralyzed horror and watching the terrifying results flood the screens around me (you understand the feeling right? We all live under One Rulfo). I am listening to Annihilation right now and it is great!

    Fin. Again (many times) Wake basically

    In otherwords we all live on the river of liffey or The Dart Oswalds, apart but together.

    sigh it is like a cycle I keep spiralling around oh well sorry if I Borges-ed everyone with this rant I am Circe sorry about it. No matter, I point and click and yet The Sea Will Claim Everything.

    • DarylOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Typical signs of a Chatbot going insane.

      Wait, was a Chatbot ever sane to begin with?

      But really, Gravity’s Rainbow? That was for readers that did not have a mind in the first place, so how could they lose it?

      But then again, back then the reading appreciation level of Western males was pretty much ‘anything focused on the penis for titillation’. That is, basic adolescent male penis-and-guns obsession.

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        But really, Gravity’s Rainbow? That was for readers that did not have a mind in the first place, so how could they lose it?

        They didn’t lose it they simply went beyond the zero, it just looks like they lost it from this perspective.

        No, this is not a disentanglement from, but a progressive knotting into.

        • DarylOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          As in 'If you are progressive, do not read too much into that book."?

    • DarylOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Let’s clarify some literary terms.

      Sci-fi means Science Fiction, or general sciences particularly. Emphasis on the general sciences as a major element in the fiction. Soc-Com refers to Social Commentary. Emphasizes discussing or hypothesizing some element of Social Science as opposed to General Science. Soc-Fi refers to ‘Social Science’ Fiction, not to be confused with ‘general science’ Fiction. It is primarily Social Commentary fiction in a fictional setting, sometimes incidentally using some principles of general science manipulation in the setting.

      Many people get these terms confused and intermingle them. Some books actually do cross over.

      Ray Bradbury wrote a lot of really good Sci-Fi. He also wrote some good Soc-Com or Soc-Fi and many tried to pretend it was still Sci-Fi. Fahrenheit 451 for example, was good Soc-Fi. Not much ‘Science’ in it, but a whole lot of ‘Social’ in it.

      When I was in high school the English department tried to convince me A Canticle for Leibowit was Sci-Fi and not Soc-Com or Soc-Fi. The science in it was horrible.

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Let’s clarify some literary terms.

        Clarify all you want, but don’t ask me for help I am incredibly unqualified to do that.

        • DarylOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          And here is me thinking that AI was a LEARNING thing.