• Slatlun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    I think they’re saying electrical transmission should be centralized, but generation should not be. Problems with double negatives…

    • NotAGinger@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      But transmission isn’t centralized, and can’t be centralized. Because its purpose is to transmit power from power generators (both centralized and decentralized) to (located elsewhere) loads.

      I assumed the OP meant generation because the other way around doesn’t make sense.

      I may also be thinking about the physical world with the OP thinking about ownership, but that makes even less sense. Transmission and generation should be paid for by the end users. Preferably in whatever way reduces their costs without making them a burden on other participants.

      Maybe the statement is talking about centralized ownership for the purposes of economies of scale. Even that can be broken down to cooperative ownership as much of the less urban areas of the United States already are.

      • Nevar@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        I meant transmission, systems that maintain load balancing, etc. Generation of renewables should be decentralized, but requiring generators to comply with creating transmission lines to rural areas or cities will create a bunch of issues around who is responsible for what, standards mismatch, and extremely high cost for smaller populations. It doesn’t seem like a good idea to me.

    • Nevar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Yes you’re correct. As per the question asked with the “NOT”, imo Electrical Grids should not be decentralized while generation should.