“Between the flooded ferries, the Russians intend to establish a boom fence. In this way, the enemy seeks to protect the Kerch bridge from defeat,” the GUR said at the time.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ah, several ferries sunk to act as basic attachment points for chains. What a cost-efficient strategy that definitely bodes well for Russian capabilities! /s

    This might work, or the Ukrainians might just send a first drone to clear a path for other ones, or use a submersible drone, or a missile once they get closer, or…

    • N0body@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ferries seem like the kind of thing you want to have above the water when your bridge keeps blowing up. It’s like reinforcing your problematic elevator by ripping out your stairs.

      • DrownedRats@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        To be fair, strategically Russia cannot hold onto Crimea and by extension most of the captured territories without the bridge whether or not they have ferries. They’d never survive the loss of the bridge which is quite likely to result in total massive domestic upheaval.

        The ferries don’t matter because without the bridge, the ferries are useless anyway

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Exactly. Like, maybe they barely floated, but this is Russia and standards for a commercially useful vessel would be incredibly low. They did this because they couldn’t arrange an alternative less-wasteful solution in a reasonable time frame; that’s the only logical explanation.