It’s a bit of an apples to oranges comparison, right? Microplastics don’t cause any global warming, they’re just a direct health risk to people and to wildlife, to some poorly-understood degree.
You really have to weigh one crisis against another, logically speaking. Unfortunately, it all gets jammed into “environmentalism” as one amorphous mass.
Would the co2 released from burning it be better or worse than the micro plastics?
It’s a bit of an apples to oranges comparison, right? Microplastics don’t cause any global warming, they’re just a direct health risk to people and to wildlife, to some poorly-understood degree.
You really have to weigh one crisis against another, logically speaking. Unfortunately, it all gets jammed into “environmentalism” as one amorphous mass.