The unintended second message is probably closer to the truth, anyways.

  • .Donuts@lemmy.worldEnglish
    13·
    3 months ago

    This seems to be a honest brand. I pulled the nutritional value from their website:

    • GreenMartian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      9·
      3 months ago

      Well it didn’t list any apples, so they are very honest! /s

      But yeah that’s actually pretty good. Except for some of us that need to control our sodium intake. 750mg/100g is reasonably high.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      3·
      3 months ago

      but hold on, literally 0g sugar? “no added sugar” is one thing, but surely there should be sugar from the apples, or something? a cake with literally 0 sugar sounds… incredibly unappealing…

  • youngalfred@lemm.ee
    6·
    3 months ago

    I read ‘no added apple sugar cake’ and thought ‘is apple sugar cake a common additive?’

  • Psaldorn@lemmy.world
    4·
    3 months ago

    FYI these are pretty good for diabetics and taste decent.

    My favourites are the muffins and the fake peanut M&Ms

    You can also get packs for cheap near use by date, on apps like Too Good To Go

    • thesystemisdown@lemmy.worldEnglish
      5·
      3 months ago

      48g of carbs per 100g is not low carb. It’s about the same as any other cake.

      Also, whatever they’re considering a ‘portion’ is not what people eat. It works out to about an ounce.

      FWIW I’d need 5-10u of insulin to cover a normal size portion. There’s probably enough fat in it to trick a glucose meter at the two hour mark, which is really faulty data for a type 2.

      Edit- strike that last part, probably not enough fat or fiber to trick a meter.

      • Psaldorn@lemmy.world
        2·
        3 months ago

        Sorry I should have elaborated I meant “as a type 2 I can have their products and not spike”, also not specifically tried the shown item.