• BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wrong tool for the job anyway.

    GIMP and photoshop have always been photo editing tools first and foremost, which means they are meant for working with bitmap graphics, not vector.

    Want to work with vector graphics? Use Inkscape.

    Would you look at that: Inkscape already has very robust shape tools

    • nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Wrong.

      “GIMP is a cross-platform image editor … Whether you are a graphic designer, photographer, illustrator, or scientist, GIMP provides you with sophisticated tools to get your job done.” - gimp.org

      Shape tools is a universal basic tool for any software that handle some sort of image creation or addition.

      Photo editing, general image editing, painting software, page layout design, vector design, PDF editor, all of them have one.

      Photoshop, Microsoft Paint, Clip Studio Paint, Krita, Photopea, Pixelmator, Affinity Photo, … all of them have shape tools.

      Heck, even Microsoft Excel and Word even have one.

      EDIT: Shape tool is planned, not yet WIP. Source: GIMP Roadmaps

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why does a shape tool have to mean vectors are involved?

      Why can’t I just draw some bitmaps in different shapes?

    • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      This comment has such a “Wanted to do X for a laugh? We had a tool for that, it’s called Y” energy, and I think that’s hilarious.

    • umbraroze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      For illustration work, having good support for both vector and bitmap elements is pretty damn convenient. For example, in comics, you draw the comics themselves in bitmap layers, while panels and speech bubbles go in vector layers. Having the ability to edit the speech bubbles easily is pretty neat.

      (Optimally inking/outlines would be vectors too, but most people prefer to do that with bitmap tools anyway, or vectorise later.)

      Krita actually does these pretty solidly - vector tools are there and they’re pretty easy to use. In GIMP 2, the vector path support actually is there and the editable texts are actually pretty great, but it has the air of “power user trick, for those in the know” rather than something people actually discover easily. You also need to update the vector strokes manually. (Haven’t tried GIMP 3 yet.) The fact that people still assume you can’t do this stuff really says it all.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’re not wrong. But also, people would love shape tools in GIMP. It still feels like a really weird thing to exclude.

    • m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      GIMP and photoshop have always been photo editing tools first and foremost

      I mean, GIMP literally means “General Image Manipulation Program”.

      Excusing the lack of proper shape drawing tools as “it’s a task for vector software” while at the same time having things like the ability to define vector masks is complete nonsense.

    • B-TR3E@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nonono, you got it all wrong. Photoshop is the one and only graphics tool, just as Word is the tool for anything text. Like layout - and wherever Word fails layouting you use Photoshop for the job. It has even more different fonts and u can use them all in one document!! Every single letter a different color and a different filter. Everything else is just not proffesional. Hahah. lolrotfl. Can your Gump do that? Thought so!