Plus they will use it to promote subscriptions. Ubisoft gets hammered for:
“gamers need to get used to not owning their games”
Microsoft who is the company that actually popularised the model, gets no flack.
I literally got censored (because I wrote like a cunt) on sh.itjust.works because I told off one of the ad company representatives sniffing around lemmy. MS spends Elon kinds of money to whitewash their image on social platforms while being one of the worst thing that happened to the gaming hobby.
Ive posted about this before, but yeah the subscription multiplayer model is probably the biggest hurdle keeping xbox games from going fully cross compatible with pc, even more than the technical challenges.
Microsoft could dump funds into a compatibility layer making xbox games work via their UWP-based App store, but they cant because of what that means for their monetization of multiplayer.
People wont welcome them charging for multiplayer on games theyre playing on their PC, so MS would rather focus on a streaming only future, where subscription is mandatory to play.
They will never be good guy Microsoft unless forced. I dont think theyre desperate enough to eliminate the multiplayer subscription, and they will probably liquidate the brand before they ever give up that income stream.
if i had to guess that’s because their subscription is cheap, was even cheaper before, and offered a lot more than ubisoft. enshittification spiral is relatively recent
huh? it’s priced roughly the same as the competitors, ea play fits that definition much better
edit: my regional pricings makes the comparison a lil harder, but it’s 3 bucks for ea play and like 6 for game pass, i think the proportions are the same elsewhere
Explain how. I’d like to hear your reasoning for this. Not saying EA is not dumping, just how that’s at all relevant to the BIGGEST company in gaming dumping or not.
Windows is the most deployed non business OS in the entire world. Every single Win10 and 11 user gets constant popus reminding them of gamepass offers. Every single computer electronics item, laptops et al sold in the EU has 1-3 months of FREE gamepass attached. Each laptop sold with Windows gets 3 free month’s worth of Gamepass. I’d like to know how EA play is worse (especially considering till Satya whipped Spenser like the little bitch he is you could get GP for 12-48€ for a year, some people subscribed for several years).
I guess Microsoft’s astroturfing budget for fringe social networks like lemmy can really only afford bottom of the barrel quality huh…
lol i don’t, check your settings maybe
This is how to remove them. A significant portion of these ads are not possible to change from userspace and are grayed out. Most people won’t even know how to do it, which begs the question
How does the reply “WoRkS fOr Me” is at all relevant to the request I made regarding an explanation why is EA access worse than gamepass.
ah, there’s the problem. nothing like that where i live so ea undercutting gamepass by 100% seems like they’re the ones dumping
Uh, if you undercut something by 100% you give it away for free, it is indeed dumping. More relevant, where do you live so I can use a VPN to get free gamepass?
If you meant, undercuts GP by 50%, and seeing you’re on sopuly, which is hosted within the EU, in the FTA countries the situation is the same, an overwhelming majority of OEM win11 keys on PCs with NVIDIA graphics are bundled with 1-3 months of free gamepass. Now I’m more curious from which backwater place you originate that the OEMs take the bundles from their customers. Interestingly enough, I’d also like to know where is EA access half of gamepass PC, considering Gamepass includes EA access…
I guess Microsoft’s astroturfing budget for fringe social networks like lemmy can really only afford bottom of the barrel quality huh…
jfc, how old are you?
yes, I meant 50%. I don’t see how saying win 10 doesn’t force gamepass ads is at all relevant to the rest of this discussion. didn’t say ea pass is worse, i said it fits the description better, judging from the pricing alone
Lol, gamers hate on Microsoft constantly, I don’t think their image is remotely white washed.
And the primary reason that Microsoft is so heavily associated with gaming (and CAD software, etc), is because they’re the ones who built DirectX, which creates an abstraction layer that developers can target without worrying about the underlying hardware and graphics cards.
Nowa days we finally have OpenGL and it’s successors, but Microsoft’s link to gaming was established by spending decades being basically the only company willing to create a more flexible and open gaming platform than consoles. Is that as nice as having open source code and standards as the abstraction layer? No, but it’s a lot nicer than Apple, Sega, Nintendo, Sony, etc who all wanted to tie the hardware directly to the games.
Lol, gamers hate on Microsoft constantly, I don’t think their image is remotely white washed.
And the primary reason that Microsoft is so heavily associated with gaming (and CAD software, etc), is because they’re the ones who built DirectX, which creates an abstraction layer that developers can target without worrying about the underlying hardware and graphics cards.
Nowa days we finally have OpenGL and it’s successors, but Microsoft’s link to gaming was established by spending decades being basically the only company willing to create a more flexible and open gaming platform than consoles. Is that as nice as having open source code and standards as the abstraction layer? No, but it’s a lot nicer than Apple, Sega, Nintendo, Sony, etc who all wanted to tie the hardware directly to the games.
OpenGL predates DirectX by several years and yet here we have someone spreading manifestly wrong information. Even Direct3D which is what should be mentioned came AFTER OpenGL. Microsoft is a trust, cheats bribes and breaks the law to maintain that trust and as a company should really be exploded into several smaller companies so that the market can have real competition again.
Plus they will use it to promote subscriptions. Ubisoft gets hammered for:
Microsoft who is the company that actually popularised the model, gets no flack.
I literally got censored (because I wrote like a cunt) on sh.itjust.works because I told off one of the ad company representatives sniffing around lemmy. MS spends Elon kinds of money to whitewash their image on social platforms while being one of the worst thing that happened to the gaming hobby.
Ive posted about this before, but yeah the subscription multiplayer model is probably the biggest hurdle keeping xbox games from going fully cross compatible with pc, even more than the technical challenges.
Microsoft could dump funds into a compatibility layer making xbox games work via their UWP-based App store, but they cant because of what that means for their monetization of multiplayer.
People wont welcome them charging for multiplayer on games theyre playing on their PC, so MS would rather focus on a streaming only future, where subscription is mandatory to play.
They will never be good guy Microsoft unless forced. I dont think theyre desperate enough to eliminate the multiplayer subscription, and they will probably liquidate the brand before they ever give up that income stream.
if i had to guess that’s because their subscription is cheap, was even cheaper before, and offered a lot more than ubisoft. enshittification spiral is relatively recent
It’s called dumping, it’s how they fish the idiots.
huh? it’s priced roughly the same as the competitors, ea play fits that definition much better
edit: my regional pricings makes the comparison a lil harder, but it’s 3 bucks for ea play and like 6 for game pass, i think the proportions are the same elsewhere
Explain how. I’d like to hear your reasoning for this. Not saying EA is not dumping, just how that’s at all relevant to the BIGGEST company in gaming dumping or not.
Windows is the most deployed non business OS in the entire world. Every single Win10 and 11 user gets constant popus reminding them of gamepass offers. Every single computer electronics item, laptops et al sold in the EU has 1-3 months of FREE gamepass attached. Each laptop sold with Windows gets 3 free month’s worth of Gamepass. I’d like to know how EA play is worse (especially considering till Satya whipped Spenser like the little bitch he is you could get GP for 12-48€ for a year, some people subscribed for several years).
lol i don’t, check your settings maybe
ah, there’s the problem. nothing like that where i live so ea undercutting gamepass by 100% seems like they’re the ones dumping
I guess Microsoft’s astroturfing budget for fringe social networks like lemmy can really only afford bottom of the barrel quality huh…
This is how to remove them. A significant portion of these ads are not possible to change from userspace and are grayed out. Most people won’t even know how to do it, which begs the question How does the reply “WoRkS fOr Me” is at all relevant to the request I made regarding an explanation why is EA access worse than gamepass.
Uh, if you undercut something by 100% you give it away for free, it is indeed dumping. More relevant, where do you live so I can use a VPN to get free gamepass? If you meant, undercuts GP by 50%, and seeing you’re on sopuly, which is hosted within the EU, in the FTA countries the situation is the same, an overwhelming majority of OEM win11 keys on PCs with NVIDIA graphics are bundled with 1-3 months of free gamepass. Now I’m more curious from which backwater place you originate that the OEMs take the bundles from their customers. Interestingly enough, I’d also like to know where is EA access half of gamepass PC, considering Gamepass includes EA access…
Ukraine. 130 vs 230 uah, respectively.
so GP includes EA access
230 - 130 (EAA) = 100 uah, meaning if anyone is dumping is Microsoft, it’s just behind an insurmountable amount of complicated arithmetic operations.
Thank you for proving my point.
jfc, how old are you?
yes, I meant 50%. I don’t see how saying win 10 doesn’t force gamepass ads is at all relevant to the rest of this discussion. didn’t say ea pass is worse, i said it fits the description better, judging from the pricing alone
Lol, gamers hate on Microsoft constantly, I don’t think their image is remotely white washed.
And the primary reason that Microsoft is so heavily associated with gaming (and CAD software, etc), is because they’re the ones who built DirectX, which creates an abstraction layer that developers can target without worrying about the underlying hardware and graphics cards.
Nowa days we finally have OpenGL and it’s successors, but Microsoft’s link to gaming was established by spending decades being basically the only company willing to create a more flexible and open gaming platform than consoles. Is that as nice as having open source code and standards as the abstraction layer? No, but it’s a lot nicer than Apple, Sega, Nintendo, Sony, etc who all wanted to tie the hardware directly to the games.
@[email protected]
See what I mean
OpenGL predates DirectX by several years and yet here we have someone spreading manifestly wrong information. Even Direct3D which is what should be mentioned came AFTER OpenGL. Microsoft is a trust, cheats bribes and breaks the law to maintain that trust and as a company should really be exploded into several smaller companies so that the market can have real competition again.