• zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ok I’m talking about fiat currency as a concept though, not the USD specifically.

    If your point is that fiat currencies are still vulnerable to some instability, then sure, I guess I agree, but fiat currencies are still orders of magnitude more stable than cryptocurrencies.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      If a state converted from paper money to crypto, the only discernible differences would be like more computers, more transparency, less middlemen, etc. Crypto is literally just a new (distributed, open) form of accounting.

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Sure, and that would make that cryptocurrency a fiat currency.

        *Also, it’s not even close to being new, the idea of distributed ledgers has been around for decades at this point.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Serious question: do the Europeans here have more faith in your governments than you do in obsessive internet people?

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I can’t answer for anyone but myself, and I’m not European, but I absolutely trust government more than anonymous obsessive Internet people. At least governments are theoretically held in check by those they govern. Internet randos don’t play by anyone’s rules but their own.