• AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      With the current administration, I’d argue we are definitely in “faith based” money right now.

      It was originally based on a gold reserve and then taken off to become a fiat currency. Trump is talking about potentially not paying back debts owned to other governments. Definitely sounds faith based to me, there’s nothing hard backing it.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        It’s funny because USA has gone bankrupt several times and most people don’t even know or acknowledge it.

        Now they just print paper money and violently force people to use it for stolen oil.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          A country, itself, cannot go “bankrupt”.

          You wanna know how we can settle debts, for pennies on the dollar, today, right now?

          Mint a 10 gajillion USD coin. Now, pay all debts. Now, destroy 10 gajillion USD coin.

          See? Impossible to go bankrupt, if you’re the buyer, generator, and seller of something, and there’s always a willing buyer.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      That’s completely meaningless and worthless though, especially since that racist empire is literally destroying the planet with its petrol-dollars.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      True, but that isn’t contradictory. The point is value of both of these forms of currency are made up and imaginary. They’re valuable as long as someone is willing to purchase it.

      The same is true for gold. People think it has intrinsic value, which is why it’s so easy to scam people with. The value is almost entirely based on people thinking it’s valuable though.

      I don’t like crypto-currencies. It “not having value” isn’t the correct argument to use against it though. It’s a pretty stupid one. There are plenty of good arguments that should be used instead.

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        They’re valuable as long as someone is willing to purchase it.

        Government based fiats always has the guarantee that the government will accept them to settle your taxes.

        So, as long as the government exists, there’s a buyer for the currency.

        Not the case with made up ponzicoins.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      The USA government? With the tariffs? And the orange buffoon in charge? If we’re counting that, then we might as well count his “crypto reserve” as backing too.

      Or it could be backed by math and economics alone.