I know theres AES and PGP, but all electronics stuff still has backdoors. You can’t backdoor a piece of paper and a writing utensil.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Hmm yea cool, problem is, its not reusable. You have to generate new keys every time. Kinda not easy to constantly exchange new keys if you are… say a group of revolutionaries hiding from the government. 👀

    • Rowan Thorpe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      In-band periodic key-exchange. Pre-arrange that keys expire every X messages, and that the last (Xth) message is dedicated to sending the new key encrypted by the previous one.

    • yoevli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      This is how all modern cryptography works. A deterministic cipher is functionally no different from pig Latin when it comes to actual security. An electronic solution like public key cryptography is infinitely more secure. If you’re especially paranoid you can generate the cryptotext locally and send it by email; that would be much safer than anything you could achieve by hand.

      • otacon239@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I would think mailing a flash drive with the key and sending the message electronically would be safer. One requires knowledge of the other.

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Hmm okay I was actually thinking of using this for journaling… so keeping a stack of OTP codes right next to my journal isn’t quite useful…

        gotta keep my evil plans for world domination a secret… MUAHAHAHAHA 😈

        • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Hmm, you’re probably going to get a lot of answers assuming you wanted to do secure communication, not secure journaling. Different beasts I would think.

    • m0darn
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’m certainly not an expert.

      But could you generate pads from mutually accessible data sources?

      Like use hit_me_baby_one_more_time_not_a_virus.mp3 appended with a password, as a seed in a pseudo random number generating algorithm, then do the same thing with another data source, repeat however many times, then XOR the generated numbers together, and use the result as a pad?

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That’s no longer a one time pad. That’s closer to a homebrew stream cipher with the weakness of having a key that you just hope no one notices.

        • m0darn
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Neat, yeah Wikipedia says steam cipher approximate one time pads but can also be completely insecure.

          I think it would take one hell of an effort to crack, it would be like 3MB encryption right? Or if they guessed the scheme they could try all mp3s ever torrented XOR’ed in every possible combination.

          Idk I think there’s something workable there but I only having a casual knowledge

          Also I think OP wanted pen and paper so maybe use a book instead digital files.