• grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The point is not that the problem started with Clinton (because it obviously didn’t); the point is that Clinton running on “third way” neoliberalism was still a viable strategy because the effects weren’t being widely felt yet.

      • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Which is also not true and doesn’t align with the economic history of the late 1970-early 1980s in the USA.

        Why do you keep misusing the term “third way”? Are you under the impression that neoliberalism and fascist economics are intertwined?