• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The point is not that the problem started with Clinton (because it obviously didn’t); the point is that Clinton running on “third way” neoliberalism was still a viable strategy because the effects weren’t being widely felt yet.

    • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Which is also not true and doesn’t align with the economic history of the late 1970-early 1980s in the USA.

      Why do you keep misusing the term “third way”? Are you under the impression that neoliberalism and fascist economics are intertwined?