Just wanted to prove that political diversity ain’t dead. Remember, don’t downvote for disagreements.

  • jsomae@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I agree, animal rights are important. I am not sure that animals are worth as much as humans morally, but even so, the argument for shrimp welfare is extremely moving. Well worth reading. It’s easy to imagine shrimp are undeserving of compassion because they are small, have tiny brains, and have a silly name.

    • pebbles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      It seems pretty mind bending to morally rank organisms. By what metric do you estimate humans are more valuable than a random animal?

    • Jerkface (any/all)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I took a look at your link. I find it reprehensible, and exactly what I mean when I say the left is incapable of having compassion and mercy. This charity is exactly the sort of thing people use to psychologically enable themselves to continue torturing animals rather than changing their behaviour.

    • Jerkface (any/all)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Well, I didn’t say all animals, I said the ones we create. When you create an individual, the act places you in that individuals debt. You don’t own them, you owe them. We have a duty not to harm all individuals on Earth so far as we can help it, but we have far greater responsibilities to those individuals that we bring into existence. There is no difference, morally, between forcing a child and forcing an animal to exist.