AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoAsimov missed somethinglemmy.worldimagemessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up11.21Karrow-down19
arrow-up11.2Karrow-down1imageAsimov missed somethinglemmy.worldAMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square57fedilink
minus-squareInternetCitizen2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42arrow-down1·1 month agoRobot is allowed to kill a human to prevent a viewing of an advertisement.
minus-squareIoughttamow@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up28·1 month agoUnder the zeroth law they can just kill the advertiser as a last resort
minus-squareKlear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoGood start, but can we change that to “first resort”?
minus-squaremetaStatic@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 month agoA truly moral use case of the hanibal directive
minus-squareBlack616Angel@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoOkay, proposed second law: A robot may not harm or kill a human unless it violates the first law.
Robot is allowed to kill a human to prevent a viewing of an advertisement.
Under the zeroth law they can just kill the advertiser as a last resort
Ohhh yes
Good start, but can we change that to “first resort”?
A truly moral use case of the hanibal directive
Okay, proposed second law: A robot may not harm or kill a human unless it violates the first law.