- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- harmreduction
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- harmreduction
For months, columnists at outlets like The Globe and Mail and The National Post have been normalizing government policies that strip people of their autonomy and force them into treatment—all under the guise of compassion.
Some of these opinion pieces come from individuals with ties to private clinics—which stand to profit from forced abstinence policies—who fail to disclose their obvious conflicts of interest.
Despite decades of evidence showing that involuntary treatment increases harm and fails to support long-term abstinence, several provincial legislatures are proposing to forcibly “treat” people for drug use.
Research has shown that people in long-term treatment do best when they enter voluntarily and that there is no sound evidence to support coercion.
So why is the public hearing a chorus of calls to expand this failed approach?
With the increasing visibility of poverty across Canada and a toxic drug crisis that shows no signs of ending, several provincial legislatures are resorting to policies like forced treatment to deflect attention away from their own failures that created these crises in the first place.
It’s the broken “disease model” of addiction. That addiction is purely chemical, and that if you simply force someone to stop taking drugs, once the chemicals leave their system and their body adapts, they will no longer be an addict.
But that’s not how it works. There are reasons beyond chemical addiction that people take drugs, and violent interventions like these only make those reasons stronger. Without addressing the underlying causes, this is just doing more harm to vulnerable people. And that’s no accident.