Recently released data for the first six months of 2024 from Toronto Public Health has found that the median age of death for women experiencing homelessness in the city is just 36.

In 2022, unhoused women who died in Toronto were on average 42 years old. That number was 43 in 2023.

The median age at death for men experiencing homelessness in the first half of 2024 was 50.

Torontonians residents, in general, live much longer with men typically dying at the age of 78 and women at the age of 85, according to 2022 data.

  • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Liberals aren’t the problem as the feds have little to do with provincial issues.

    This is on Drug Fraud’s shoulders alone … and he couldn’t give a shit about poor unhoused women’s deaths.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Absolving federal government from the material conditions imposed upon the slave force is an a way to approach this issue lol

      • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        According the Constitutional divide of fed/provincial powers the only thing the feds can do is provide funding. Then it’s up to the provinces to use the funding appropriately.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s is narrow view of the causes of the issue and required solutions imho

          But sure, state’s implementation is critical, but aint this is an endemic issue across all of Canada? Shit… all of North America (ex MX)?

          Homeless and people are dying is the intentional product of the current regime.

          • Dearche
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s not an issue inherent to any regime, but one of economic motivators. The fundamental economic system is designed around the idea of squeezing value upwards through any means necessary. Governments are the force that prevents this sort of thing from happening excessively via regulations. It’s why Canada wasn’t hit nearly as bad as other countries during the 2008 financial crisis, because we had good banking regulations that prevented the worst from that happening over here. Unfortunately, those regulations got demolished a few years later, but the principal itself stands.

            Part of governments is to be the moral stand that forces the economy to include morality as part of its working principal, despite every incentive of capitalism is to discard morality as an obstacle. It’s the balancing force that makes a country prosper not just materially, but culturally and morally.

            That said, it is the failure of modern governments to enforce such moral behaviour these last two decades especially, but it is also a failure of us voters to force them to make good and uphold such morals in the first place. Governments are supposed to fear the masses, but we’ve let them go without fear for so long that they have all become quite entitled to their positions.

            • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              That said, it is the failure of modern governments to enforce such moral behaviour these last two decades especially, but it is also a failure of us voters to force them to make good and uphold such morals in the first place.

              I would also add that the encroachment of the religious far-right from America has had a detrimental effect on how voters judge who is and is not acting in a “moral” way. Religiosity is still seen as having a “moral code”, even tho there are dozens/hundreds of immoral acts commited by such people (and institutions).

              • Dearche
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Well, plenty of religious people simply use their religion as a shield and don’t actually follow the tenants.

                I mean, it’s a common thing for atheists to know the bible better than people who wave around crosses screaming about Jesus doing this or that all the time.

                That said, this last decade or so had the left using moral outrage as their founding principal to enforce their own “morals” onto others, stating that any other opinion on the subject is invalid and contravenes morals, despite the very act of denying others a voice in itself is immoral.

                Pretty much every group can use morality as a weapon to discriminate against others when they embrace anger and hate as their motivation.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The Federal Government has pledged $6 billion in federal funding to address Canada’s housing crisis; however, to access the funds, provinces and territories must meet specific conditions[1][3]. One of these conditions includes allowing fourplexes to be built “as of right,” but Ontario Premier Doug Ford has rejected this idea[1].

        Key Points:

        • Canada Housing Infrastructure Fund The federal government is creating a $6 billion fund to construct and upgrade water, wastewater, stormwater, and solid waste infrastructure[1]. $1 billion will go directly to municipalities for urgent infrastructure needs[1][3]. The remaining $5 billion would be allocated through agreements with provinces and territories to support long-term priorities[3].
        • Conditions Provinces must allow the development of four-unit residential dwellings to access the funding[5].
        • Ontario’s Stance Premier Doug Ford has refused to force municipalities to allow fourplexes on residential land[5]. He believes municipalities should determine what is good for their communities[5]. The Ford government appears to be casting aside the federal government’s latest housing plan, which would require provincial buy-in on fourplexes in order to receiving funding from Ottawa in 2025[7].
        • Federal Perspective The federal government is attaching strings to the money to incentivize changes needed to solve the national housing crisis[1]. Housing Minister Sean Fraser stated that the funding aims to “actually solve the national housing crisis, not just play at the margins”[7].
        • Additional Measures The federal government is also increasing its housing accelerator fund by $400 million over three years, which is expected to help build an additional 12,000 homes[1][3].
        • Criticism Conservative housing critic Scott Aitchison has dismissed the announcement as a " $4 billion dollar photo op fund"[1].

        Citations: [1] Federal government pledges $6B for housing in new infrastructure … https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/justin-trudeau-budget-housing-1.7161005 [2] Ford threatens to cut off Ontario’s energy supply to U.S. if Trump … https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/doug-ford-ontario-premiers-meet-justin-trudeau-1.7407948 [3] Ottawa to launch $6B infrastructure fund to help build homes https://ottawa.citynews.ca/2024/04/02/ottawa-to-launch-6b-infrastructure-fund-to-help-build-homes-with-strings-attached/ [4] Provinces reject $6-billion housing program announced by Trudeau … https://www.reddit.com/r/CanadaPolitics/comments/1bumooo/provinces_reject_6billion_housing_program/ [5] Ford doubles down on refusal to allow fourplexes provincewide - CBC https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ford-fourplexes-infrastructure-funding-1.7162251 [6] Don’t be fooled: It was Doug Ford… - Meanwhile in Canada | Facebook https://www.facebook.com/MeanwhileinCanada1/posts/dont-be-fooled-it-was-doug-ford-who-gave-musk-the-hugely-over-priced-starlink-co/1022779166544123/ [7] Ford government could reject latest federal housing package https://globalnews.ca/news/10398150/federal-housing-fund-ontario-response/ [8] Ontario not budging on fourplexes despite federal funding on the line https://www.ctvnews.ca/toronto/article/ontario-not-budging-on-fourplexes-despite-federal-funding-on-the-line/ [9] Why Ottawa’s $6B housing infrastructure fund has some provinces … https://financialpost.com/real-estate/ottawa-6-billion-infrastructure-fund-provinces-fuming