An executive order issued Friday by President Donald Trump that aims to rollback gun control measures instituted by his predecessor received swift rebuke from critics who said the order should be seen as a giveaway to the profit-hungry gun industry at the expense of a society ruthlessly harmed by gun violence year after year after year.

  • SupraMario@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    None of those policies stop mass shootings. They’re just virtue signaling from anti-2a groups.

    Do something meaningful for once that doesn’t target trying to magically make murder somehow more illegal.

    Put the time and political capital into things that actually would change our society.

    Single payer healthcare, so people can get mental health without going broke and avoiding it. Or turning to suicide, which is 2/3rds of our firearm deaths.

    Reform prisoners, not lock them away for forever and rob them of ever being a productive member of society.

    Get rid of for profit prisons, so we’re not turning an addict into someone who gets out of prison and can’t get a job because they carry a felony.

    End qualified immunity so the 1/40 gun deaths aren’t from police who just kill people and get away with it.

    Increase our school funding 10 fold. Build more schools, so class sizes can be 10-15 kids max per teacher. Not 30-40+

    Solidify abortion rights into law, why the hell it’s been left to the courts for so long is insane. More unwanted children doesn’t create mentally stable people.

    The list of shit that actually could stop mass shootings is a mile long…but bullshit laws aren’t going to have any effect on it. Remember, Columbine happened during the AWB

    • LePoisson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Agree with doing all that.

      I still feel like some more regulations and laws could help. It’s simply too easy to purchase firearms in the USA. Personally I’d like to see it more akin to how we license and regulate motor vehicles. I want people to need a license to purchase a firearm, and that license includes getting firearm safety instruction, a background check that’s better than the current one we have in place, and requiring a range qualification too.

      It would really help if people were better educated on guns in general, at the very least I think it’d help cut down on accidental gun deaths and suicides.

    • corsicanguppy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Remember, Columbine happened during the AWB

      Likewise, I still had leaks after plugging half the holes in my boat. I couldn’t explain it !

  • hddsx
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    He’s rolling back gun regulation?

    So that means we’ll have the right weapons to counter the SS coming door to door to look for “illegals”?

    • Banana@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yeah i was thinking it’s awfully stupid (good for the people) of him to arm the proletariat…

      • hddsx
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        With deregulation, the FBI probably can’t finish the background check within the required time frame which means the buyer is automatically approved at end of said timeframe IIRC.

        I’m not saying we should deregulate firearms at all, but if we’re doing it we might as well use the second amendment as originally intended

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m not saying we should deregulate firearms at all, but if we’re doing it we might as well use the second amendment as originally intended

          So for well-regulated militias?

          • hddsx
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yep, for each state to defend itself

              • hddsx
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                It gives states the power to defend against incursion by other states.

                • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  So balkanization and warring states. On top of the neo-feudalism.

                  50 wealthy white dudes, each with their own fiefdom. Sounds amazing.

                  What’s the point of having a federal government at that point?

    • corsicanguppy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      He’s rolling back gun regulation?

      How come the headline used the noun “rollback” and not the verb “roll back”? It would seem Trump “rollbacked” the legislation, then.

      (When journos can’t spell, I do not trust them)

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      When you look at Donald Trump as a Trojan horse in the cold war, everything makes sense.

      • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        My university education was largely targeting the US diplomatic response to the downfall of the USSR and the rise of the CIS. One of my professors was ex-KGB who worked with the Stasi in East Germany and was a spy for MI-5. He mentioned on more than one occasion that his former colleagues were very angry over the loss of the ColdWar and many would want revenge. I believe this is that revenge.