• Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Let’s not get astray here.

    The reason El Salvador stopped using Bitcoin as a legal tender is not because it’s some sort of failed experiment (it had issues, but still), but due to continuous pressure of IMF interested in maintaining a US dollar-centric economy.

    El Salvador is reliant on US dollars in its economy, which puts it under heavy US influence. Knowing Salvadoran currency wouldn’t be strong, Nayib Bukele suggested an alternative option - risky, volatile, but free from pressure of other countries and strongly appreciating in the long run. IMF didn’t like it, and that’s where we are.

    So, when you cheer Bitcoin not being legal tender anymore, you also cheer US and IMF projecting power over the country.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 minutes ago

      Yeah the headline is insane. This would have been a wildly successful experiment, and now is a great time to cash out.

      I guess they made a deal to sell their coins to the US.

      Edit: misinformation, sorry. They’re not selling. they’re still buying. The IMF is just forcing them to strike the word legal tender

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Its even funnier. They just straight up promised them a billion dollar loan on the condition that they abandon bitcoin.

      In December, the government struck a $1.4 billion loan deal with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) that scaled back its bitcoin embrace after the lender urged officials to limit its exposure. The lender specifically advocated making acceptance of bitcoin voluntary for the private sector, which is spelled out in the hastily-approved law.

      https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/lawmakers-el-salvador-rush-new-bitcoin-reform-after-imf-deal-2025-01-30/

    • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Exactly. The title is misleading af

      They were forced to stop using Bitcoin as legal tender by external parties. The question people should be asking is why? And the answer is not that it was a failed experiment.

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The experiment was to move beyond external parties. They were not able to do so and returned to using external parties. Ergo “the experiment failed”.

        • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          57 minutes ago

          They were forced to do it by the IMF and US

          Why do you think that they’d care about it if it was failing?

          • fishos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 minutes ago

            So they experimented with resisting the US and IMF and it was not successful.

            We call that an experimental failure.

            You really don’t get it. “Blockchain” was not the experiment. “Utilizing blockchain in the global economy” was the experiment.

            And it failed.