floofloof to U.S. News@beehaw.orgEnglish · 11 hours agoCDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up164arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up164arrow-down1external-linkCDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.comfloofloof to U.S. News@beehaw.orgEnglish · 11 hours agomessage-square8fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squarenotabot@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·5 hours agoWould the journals be under any obligation to accept these bad-faith revisions or retractions?
minus-squareMidnitte@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoThe for-profit journals that are asking for more money, your asking what might motivate them?
minus-squarenotabot@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·29 minutes agoThey already have the money for the original paper, do they charge for retractions? I don’t know, but I’d assumed not.
Would the journals be under any obligation to accept these bad-faith revisions or retractions?
The for-profit journals that are asking for more money, your asking what might motivate them?
They already have the money for the original paper, do they charge for retractions? I don’t know, but I’d assumed not.