Summary

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. accused Bernie Sanders of taking millions from Big Pharma during a heated exchange, but Sanders refuted the claim, stating his donations came from workers, not corporate PACs.

Kennedy repeatedly insisted Sanders was the top recipient of pharmaceutical money in 2020, but financial data shows no corporate PAC contributions to Sanders.

Meanwhile, Kennedy has profited from anti-vaccine activism, earning millions from lawsuits and speaking fees.

The debate ended without Kennedy answering whether he would guarantee health care for all as HHS secretary.

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    He doesn’t need a better source. We’re talking about how language is used in society, and it proves that point fine.

    I might hate terms like “Rizz” but as long as people use them to refer to a certain context, there’s no room to argue that “Technically, Rizz isn’t a word!!11”

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      No, he does as not all sources are valid. I for one would argue a game designer and writer aren’t going to be sources I would rely upon to define matters related to elections. There are better sources that are reliable and valid this game is not one.