• dedales@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    So I guess it is better than current product but it really feel like appropriation of ecology by capitalism. There is no serious need for smart watches, it feels to me like a perfect example of artificial demand. The ecological solution to the e-waste caused by smart watches is to stop producing those.

    • fourish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      You may not need one but as someone that has a medical condition constantly logged by a smartwatch there absolutely is a serious need by others.

      It’s like saying I don’t need a wheelchair, nobody else does either, which is crazy.

      • Dedale@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Sorry, my comment was poorly phrased. I meant that there was no mainstream need for it. I get that it can be really useful as a medical device, but in this case I still believe that a full smart watch is overblown. Medical devices are generally tailored to answer a specific need, I do not know of a wheelchair that streams music by Bluetooth or allows you to pay with them. It’s the accumulation of features that makes it way less repairable and susceptible to failures. In the case of a medical usage, I don’t really see how a full smartwatch is more useful than a simple Fitbit-like device. In fact, I am involved in a mass medical data acquisition project that uses Fitbit to track the everyday condition of patient with schizophrenia symptoms. This specific part is clearly not my area of expertise but my colleagues seem to think that it is sufficient.

        Again, I am sorry if my comment hurted you.

    • TDCN@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      I use mine extensively as a health monitor/tracker. I now have 3 years worth of heart rate data and can see early warnings of potential issues if it changes. Also it tracks my daily activity for step counts and also my sleep habits. It is also really good for getting off my phone since I can easily see notifications and if they aren’t important I can just look at them later instead of always having to check my phone. Also it tells the time so thats nice too.

    • Rentlar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      There is no serious need

      I think this is perfect for people that do exercise, athletic training and sports. A smart watch is useful for heart rate monitoring, not needing to check your phone for distance measurements or notifications. A conventional digital watch can be a chronometer, timer, maybe heart rate if fancy but there are real benefits to the “smart” functionality.

      Not everyone needs one of these, but there is a certain segment that smart watches are best for, and if there is one that has an open design and ecosystem compared to others like Samsung, Apple this is excellent.

    • the16bitgamer@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve been using smart watches since the Pebble Time Steel. The reason I use a smart watch is to get off my phone more.

      I use it to screen important notifications, read messages, and to tell the time.

      It’s a niche use case but I find it helpful especially at work to see what’s happening without pulling it out.

      That said my poor pebble isn’t used much these days, and I’ve moved to Garmin. These have always on reflective displays like e-paper that sips batteries. Plus I’ve been using my garmin to track my exercise which is nice.

      Definitely cant recommend the more battery sensitive Apple Watch or the Samsung or google equivalent. But if it lasts 1-2 weeks on a single charge with the screen always showing the time, it’s better than a contemporary watch.