Some folks on here have been repeating this garbage as well

  • Victor Villas
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    a lot (most) of people with your view simply aren’t aware of the current rental (let alone sale) market situation

    What is my view, again? I think I am pretty aware of the rental market situation as I’m a renter myself, with a very recent contract.

    I don’t think ensuring the people entering Canada have an even somewhat affordable place to live is “anti-immigration”.

    If the path to ensure that is not allowing them to immigrate, it really is impossible to spin this as anything else than anti-immigration…

    • BedSharkPal
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      By that logic why not raise the immigration targets to 10 million a year? 20? 50?

      • Victor Villas
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        By which logic? What specific sentence gave you the impression that I think we should increase immigration targets?

        • BedSharkPal
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If the path to ensure that is not allowing them to immigrate, it really is impossible to spin this as anything else than anti-immigration…

          If you’re not allowing everyone who wants to immigrate here the opportunity - isn’t that anti-immigration?

          • Victor Villas
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It depends on which kind of debate you’re having and which definitions you’re starting from.

            I’d say that most people who would call themselves pro-immigration don’t go as far as saying that absolutely anyone should be allowed immigrant status, so I wouldn’t call being against that position anti-immigration.

            I do think that most people who would call themselves pro-immigration would agree that it’s understandable that provinces can dial up or down on immigration programs of skilled labor depending on economic circumstances. So I wouldn’t say that reducing immigration numbers in any form is an inherently anti-immigration stance either.

            I do think, however, that saying that we should reduce immigration because immigrants are making housing unaffordable is solidly on the anti-immigration side. There’s a pretty intuitive divide here.