• Atrichum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Most plant varieties are copywrited, or somwthing similar. It’s not actually as crazy as it sounds but it’s definitely abused, just like all copyright law.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Living things shouldn’t be copyrighted tbh. Neither should food. Plants often being both, but always the first one at least.

        • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think if a company is going to dump millions into developing a new product, they should be able to at least recoup the investment they made.

      • Shelbyeileen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Most are specially bred to produce specific styles of fresh produce, like bananas, but this was the first company I’d heard of that removed the ability to propagate. (Aside from seedless stuff like watermelon/grapes) You can go to Japan and get one of the hundred dollar strawberries and you could technically keep the seeds. Lettuce, onion, garlic, tomatoes, peppers, berries, bananas, ginger, potatoes, corn; almost everything can grow from leftover cooking scraps. Plants are resilient.

        Chopping the top off, is capitalism at its worst. I can understand not allowing another company to sell the genetically modified produce, but cutting off the top lowers the shelf life and makes it impossible to re-grow. It’s pure greed… especially when it can take 3+ years for a pineapple to produce more fruit.