• Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Rootless Linux based on containers or at the very least better practices like least privilege.

    Android has done a very good job with security. Let’s do that for the desktop.

  • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    More users.

    But seriously, more ports of and/or viable alternatives to professional applications. It’s the top reason people stick with Windows—even when they don’t like it.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I don’t see that happening like you think it can.

      I think trying to get people on Linux is kind of silly. Just document the stuff you do and post about how you solve your own problems.

  • Cris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago
    1. Built-in Local AI Assistant

    2. Local AI-Based Image/Video Editing Features

    Are these like… Really things people want…? These seem either superfluous, or like they should just be standalone apps dedicated to this sort of functionality if people want them.

    These are niche in their actual usefulness to a point of essentially being irrelevant. Of all the user experience polish, nice-to-have-features, and general system integration that this space needs, these kinda feel like proactive wastes of time…

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The “AI” stuff is just fluff and isn’t something that should be forced into everything. It isn’t going anywhere but it would be nice if the tech would hurry up and settle.

  • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago
    1. Built-in Local AI Assistant

    Yess, because if I’ve learned one thing in the past year, then it’s that users love AI being shoved into everything!

    Why stop at an AI assistant? Build AI into the kernel, I say! Let AI handle system calls, so everyone can be a low-level programmer! The kernel will just guess what your intentions were!

    • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      But an NPU is a much-needed necessity for most users! We definitely need to include a LLM in every base image so that this necessity can actually be used by software.

    • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      I’m not a super-savvy user. Can someone explain to me why I should care about X vs Wayland? Everything seems to work with X, and as I’ve just read, many programs don’t support Wayland. So will this transition just lead to lots of broken software once someone decides they won’t ship with X by default anymore?

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        X is broken and the people who understand it at a deep level are pretty much all dead. What’s worse is that the code base is massive and doesn’t follow modern code practices.

        Wayland is different as there is no codebase. It is simply a set of standards that allow apps to connect to a desktop.

        The X model:

        App -> window manager -> X server -> hardware

        The Wayland model:

        App -> desktop -> hardware

        This sounds like it wouldn’t be that big of improvement but unlike X Wayland is designed to take advantage of the modern GPU horse power. X was originally designed to run on UNIX mainframes so to make it run like it does took a bunch of Jacky work arounds.

      • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        You basically shouldn’t until you are forced to move. Almost all of the improvements so far are in the internal architecture.

        You might notice some tiny differences if you switch, like logging in doesn’t show a black screen at any point, and window choosers when screen sharing show a (totally broken) grid of previews instead of a plain list of window titles.

        Hopefully when X is fully dead (give it another 10 years) we’ll see some actual improvements, e.g. RDP-style remote desktop, good support for multi-monitor, HDR, HiDPI, etc.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I’m not sure if you have been paying attention but Wayland has come very far in the last year or two. It has XDG portals for screen sharing, HDR (early support), display scaling and plenty of other stuff.

      • Ketata Mohamed@mastodon.tn
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        @bleistift2 @addie Wayland will be the only display server, it’s impossible to deny it, for example KDE defaults to Wayland & Gnome is 100% detached from X11, the deletion of X11 is coming in the future
        plus, X11 is full of spaghetti code and no one, and I mean no one, supports it anymore, Wayland came to correct that, plus if you have a laptop with a hybrid GPU, you must switch manually between for example Nvidia & Intel, on Wayland everything is done automatically, etc

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Wayland isn’t a display server, it is a protocol. There is no source code for Wayland only a set of standards.

        • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          if you have a laptop with a hybrid GPU

          That is something I really care about. Thanks!

          [Edit: I just checked. Something is handling the switch automatically on my system]

      • RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Wayland is basically the direct successor to X11. It basically fixes tearing, makes HDR possible, makes scaling way better, and is all-round just better prepared for the future. I’ve been using it for years without much trouble. The only issues I keep having are scripts which expect x11-specific tools to be there, but that seems to be quickly solving itself while people realize that x11 is quickly loosing support. If you want to try it, I recommend setting up a fresh installation of a distro with KDE, Gnome, Sway, or Hyprland, just to make sure all the right dependencies are installed.

        • SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Wayland is basically the direct successor to X11

          Being pedantic. Wayland is a replacement not a successor. It’s for those X does it, why not Wayland, situations.

  • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Remembering my screen layout so I don’t have to manually switch after every boot?

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Hopefully the distros integrate ollama or similar so users don’t have to think about it. And it all runs locally.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      How about no. Users can install apps like Alpaca if they want AI. Right now there are zero Foss models anyway and there are many copyright issues.

    • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Anything like that should absolutely be left up to the user. The distro should not decide that for you. If you want it, install it and set it up yourself.

      • Womble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I dont see any harm in including support for running models built into the distro and then providing easy access to a pre-selected list of models to use with that if the user wants.

        • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Sure, I agree with that. But that should, at the very least, not be included in a general purpose distro aimed at beginners unless they offer it as a seperate download or something. I feel like this kind of thing should be a seperate edition of the distro or something for people who actually want it.