blueskyposter@lemmings.world to Bluesky@lemmy.world · 3 days agobUT iT PaYs bACk iN ToUriSMlemmings.worldimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1753arrow-down120
arrow-up1733arrow-down1imagebUT iT PaYs bACk iN ToUriSMlemmings.worldblueskyposter@lemmings.world to Bluesky@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square67fedilink
minus-squarefeedum_sneedson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down2·2 days agoMaybe it does pay back in tourism? Either way let’s have the social housing as well.
minus-squareKlear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 day agoTourism pays even without the royals. Just look at Versailles.
minus-squareikidd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 day agoHow much does a guillotine cost again?
minus-squarefeedum_sneedson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·1 day agoIn which case the taxpayer would still be paying to renovate Buckingham Palace. What’s he going to do, sell it? Let us keep our pet family.
minus-squarefeedum_sneedson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoThat would imply they feed me, etc.
minus-squarefeedum_sneedson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day agooh right well in that case just clean up after yourselves
Maybe it does pay back in tourism? Either way let’s have the social housing as well.
Tourism pays even without the royals. Just look at Versailles.
How much does a guillotine cost again?
Buck o’ five.
In which case the taxpayer would still be paying to renovate Buckingham Palace. What’s he going to do, sell it? Let us keep our pet family.
You are the pets.
That would imply they feed me, etc.
No.
oh right well in that case just clean up after yourselves
No, it’s one or the other!