• lemonmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 hours ago

    English is so inconsistent at this point.

    At this point? At this very point, specifically due to the historically valid usage of one gender neutral pronoun? Now is the time that it’s finally become an inconsistent language? Singular “they” is the thing that has pushed English over the edge from logical and sensical to arbitrary and confusing? Of all the foibles and quirks, this is the one that is simply unforgivable and must be changed?

    • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I didn’t say anything you said.

      I think a more sensible way to include LGBT+ group is to just make “she/her” obsolete. We are all “he/him”, and we are “they/them” when in a group. Way cleaner than this, excuse me, shit that we foreign English speakers have to adjust to for every few years.

      • belastend@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Mate, english is my second language too and this is not that confusing.

        Singular they/them has been here for hundreds of years and using it as a gender neutral alternative to she/her and he/him isnt shit, its part of the english language.

      • dont_lemmee_down@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        We agree. We make he/him obsolete and we’re all she/her, as there are more female people on the planet, so less people have to adapt

        • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          “he/him” probably isn’t he/him in their non-gendered language. In some languages there’s no he or she, there’s only a pronoun that means “that person”

          Armenian, Persian, Tagalog, Finnish, Georgian, Turkish, Swahili &c