Lemmy.ca
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Bluesky@lemmy.world · 7 months ago

Thoughts?

slrpnk.net

message-square
20
link
fedilink
531

Thoughts?

slrpnk.net

ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Bluesky@lemmy.world · 7 months ago
message-square
20
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Luigi’s main mistake was not making millions upon millions of dollars by killing a CEO. He forgot the part that would have made it moral.

      • IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          Nah, it was pulling down his mask at Starbucks, going to McDonald’s, etc. (Assuming they even have the right guy)

  • skozzii
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    This killing has created a very difficult question.

    If killing one of these CEOs can save tens of thousands of lives, then it is the morally correct thing to do.

    And that’s a huge problem with the system. Murder should never be the morally correct thing, but in this case it could save so many lives its impossible to argue against it being the right thing.

    • CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      All the “my claims magically aren’t being denied anymore after the 4th” posts are telling me that this action has already started saved lives. Theres a national conversation now happening about how the industry got so bad that more Americans are celebrating this execution than not, and what needs to be done to (nonviolently) fix the problem. Publicly killing a CEO proved to be an effective solution literally in the first 24 hours.

      • univers3man@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not that I don’t believe you, but do you have any sources on that? If so, I want to spread the news.

        • CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 months ago

          The posts about claim-reversals are just something I’ve seen a few posts about here and on FB, no news sources.

          I do have a semi-related Snopes article: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/anthem-blue-cross-shield-anesthesia/ Anthem BCBS had an unpopular anesthesia policy that they walked back on December 5th. Probably a coincidence.

          But also, here’s several stories about people expressing their outrage.

          Americans hate their private health insurance

          Brian Thompson’s killing sparks outrage over state of US healthcare

          UnitedHealthcare Denies More Claims Than Other Insurers — Angering Patients And Health Systems

          After shooting, UnitedHealthcare comes under scrutiny for AI use in treatment approval

          All of these had been in the news, but the killing has pushed the conversation center stage. It’s a strange and funny time too, since Trump is promising to roll back the ACA and make all of this much worse. People apparently just have no idea that the ACA and Obamacare are the same thing, or that it’s the reason they even have insurance at all.

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            deleted by creator

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      deleted by creator

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It’s gonna take more than just one exec, its gonna take dozens, if not hundreds of them. But the math still checks out in terms of it being the moral thing to do.

        They’re killing people by the hundreds of thousands through their greed.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          deleted by creator

          • LemmyFeed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah they’re going to wait for the next news cycle or financial quarter then double down and increase security. As long as these companies make more money than they spend on protection and security then they will keep doing it.

  • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    “The death of one man is a tragedy. The death of millions is a statistic.”

    Sorry, but that’s the reality we live in. There are mass murders committed all the time by companies and governments, and while we may stand against some of them (even to the extent where we endorse vigilante justice), we approve of, either directly or by our silence, many other mass murders. I firmly believe there isn’t anyone on this world who wasn’t complicit in some corporate or governmental mass murders, and as such, I don’t think there will ever be agreement which CEOs and politicians to shoot and which to spare.

  • anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yay: Masked murder

    Nay: Mass murder

  • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    Simple, CEOs are not human beings. Because murder can only happen between human beings, the top picture is mislabeled. I’d call it something like pest control.

    • LouNeko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      The only objectively correct opinion.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    These people were murdered for being responsible and preparing for the inevitable day sickness would come.

    They were entitled to THEIR prepaid life saving care.

    And we’re instead both conned and murdered.

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Agreed on the premise of the comic. Disappointed on the quality of the photoshop.

  • solomon42069@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    One of them is bit more direct

    • cheers_queers@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      does that matter?

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s a distinction between the two but whether it matters depends on what’s being discussed.

        • kurwa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          So you’re saying if the guy killed him with a rube goldberg machine it would be equivalent?

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Not really

  • darthsid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    One is legal. Legal is getting dirtier day by day.

Bluesky@lemmy.world

peoplebluesky@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

People skeeting stuff.

Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 70 users / day
  • 3.11K users / week
  • 5.84K users / month
  • 10.2K users / 6 months
  • 41 local subscribers
  • 1.39K subscribers
  • 224 Posts
  • 4.58K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • TheArstaInventor@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org