• finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Describing the system that put Stalin in power as the perfect solution for the USA reads to me that they’re a tankie.

        • mediocrestate@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t like Leninists but there’s a difference between their idea of a workers state and what happened in the Soviet Union. I do think their intention matters even if the historical outcomes have been bad

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            When you use violence and force to take power.

            Then the power of your new state will be a forceful and violent one.

            There is no other outcome. We’ve tested this countless times, already. The USA at a glance is primed for a civil war, and the winners are very likely not the ones you’re thinking of.

            • mediocrestate@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              See I actually agree with you, I don’t like Leninists, but I distinguish between Leninists who believe in their vanguard parties and Tankies who think the strongmen who come out of them are a good thing.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Well the Tankie you’re defending also said the USSR economy was great during and after the 1930s, which not only was under Joseph Stalin’s rule but was also having mass famine, but I can see how their comments are difficult to read.