• Perroboc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think you’re right. For the average desktop user, it’s more about being able to use the software they need, without a terminal.

    I think that desktop in linux has advanced a lot in the last few years, and now I’m running my games on a KDE desktop, too! But I keep having to go to the terminal to do stuff I took for granted on other systems, like OS security updates.

    • djmarcone@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The linux developers have done an awesome job and linux has come so far it’s amazing. But for the vast majority of computer users they don’t even know what a terminal is, period, and linux is useless to them unless a Linux user sets it up for them for a very specific use case and that’s all they ever do with it.

      If all they want is an email and web appliance, a typical computer ignorant user can use linux if it is given to them by someone else.

      Yet an ignorant computer user can go and buy a Mac or a windows machine from a retailer and get the job done without having to know anything at all other than they want a computer for x y or z.

      Its like the linux developers can’t fathom a PC experience without the terminal as a vital participant.

      • planish@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Its like the linux developers can’t fathom a PC experience without the terminal as a vital participant.

        That’s not wrong. I’m now struggling to do things on Windows without the terminal. Thinking in terms of commands and processes and files is a great way to do computing. Learning all that stuff has a payoff and it genuinely is difficult to imagine trying to get by without knowing it. Once you do know it you reach for it all the time.