• RedSeries@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    What are you gonna do if we call, Jack? Sit with your thumb up your ass for four years and accomplish nothing?

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Nah. They engaged in textbook bottom-up investigation knowing they’d be prosecuting a former president and going up against stacked courts.

          The stacked courts delayed everything. Would’ve happened regardless; the only difference is if Garland/Smith rushed, they might risk a lack of corroborating evidence to convince a jury or lose on technicalities.

          As much as it pains me to say it, I’d rather this than a jury returning a Not Guilty.

          The biggest bullshit post-election is this scapegoating Garland. That we knew Trump was a convicted felon and pending 3 other trials and still voted for him is kind of a bigger problem.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Jack Smith just did the best thing he could do by dropping the charges now.

          In January they’d be dismissed with prejudice. By dropping them now, they can be re-filed when Trump leaves office.