“Our hands are outstretched to any MLA that wants to work with us on [our] key priorities with just one bright line exception: we will not tolerate hate, discrimination, conspiracy theory garbage.”

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    “To have the audacity to say that they will and will not work with someone, I’m sorry, that is not his choice,” Rustad said. “That is not something he has the authority to do.”

    Yes it is lmao. His party has a majority and does not have to work with you, you sore loser.

    Also shame on Weaver and the others who are throwing shade on Eby for taking this stance. Conspiracy-laden fascist garbage like Rustad shouldn’t ever be given a single morsel of cooperation or respect. I find it hard to believe that Weaver would have ever worked with the likes of Rustad, so him saying this just reeks of double standards.

  • BlameThePeacock
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    They won’t be able to address the cost of living issue.

    They can’t. The policy changes required are too painful for voters to accept.

    The easy fix to make cost of living cheaper is to crash the price of homes. Cheaper homes means cheaper labour (since people don’t need to make as much to rent/own) which in turn translates to cheaper everything produced by labour in this country. It makes our country more competitive globally too, though certain imports would be more expensive relative to percentage of income than they are now.

    The government could crash home prices in a half dozen different ways, but it means that existing home owners would lose almost all the value of their home, which they’ve been told their entire life is an investment. Some people would literally end up with no retirement funds because they were banking on their house getting them through the last few years. Almost everyone who bought in the last 10 years would end up with mortgages which are greater than the value of their home that they would still have to pay legally.

    We aren’t talking about a few thousand dollars here either, a single condo owner would lose multiple hundreds of thousands of dollars and some families would lose more than a million dollars on single family home. It would bankrupt almost every single landlord, even those people who just rent a suite and rely on it to pay the mortgage.

    I don’t think voters are willing to do that, given that close to 65% of Canadian homes are owned by the family that live in them, and home owners tend to vote more than non-owners.

    We’ve built a pyramid scheme on real estate, and far too many Canadians are invested in their home to want to let the system crumble. So we’re just fucking the next generation harder and harder until eventually we won’t have a choice.

    • Sonori@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Ideally however, the government could however work to hold the price of homes relatively constant, and let inflation slowly bring them back into affordability. This would piss off everyone, but it would safely deflate the bubble without damaging people’s retirement too much.