🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agoAnon tries to manipulate Tindersh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1514arrow-down152
arrow-up1462arrow-down1imageAnon tries to manipulate Tindersh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agomessage-square83fedilink
minus-squareSaledovil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up51arrow-down2·1 month ago How is that “dehumanizing” when human is literally in the explanation. Had it been “female apeoid” I’d have agreed, but humanoid… So “moid” for male humanoid is “dehumanizing” too? “A humanoid is a non-human entity with human form or characteristics.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanoid A humanoid is by definition not human, hence calling a human a humanoid is dehumanizing.
minus-squareatro_city@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up34·1 month agoI stand corrected. Thank you for the explanation. 👍
minus-squareclickyello@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·1 month agograceful. props to you. more people should be like this.
“A humanoid is a non-human entity with human form or characteristics.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanoid
A humanoid is by definition not human, hence calling a human a humanoid is dehumanizing.
I stand corrected. Thank you for the explanation. 👍
graceful. props to you.
more people should be like this.