The difference between a helpmeet and a parasite is power. If we want to enjoy the benefits of intermediaries without the risks, we need policies that keep middlemen weak. That’s the opposite of the system we have now.

Take interoperability and IP law. Interoperability (basically, plugging new things into existing things) is a really powerful check against powerful middlemen. If you rely on an ad-exchange to fund your newsgathering and they start ripping you off, then an interoperable system that lets you use a different exchange will not only end the rip off – it’ll make it less likely to happen in the first place because the ad-tech platform will be afraid of losing your business

  • ErsatzCoalButter@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Doctorow can write a great detective novel but he lives in absolute La La land. I’m glad he’s open about the fact he’s just distracting himself with this post, but the idea that these webs of laws or these models of “how things should work” mean anything tho the people with power are complete nonsense.

    He has some understanding of that, I think? But like, buddy, your country just went full Nazi. You’ve been living in a total fantasy. You’re not going to rethink the concept of fixers, get a grip.

    • drspod@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Did you think this blog post was aimed at the people with power, to petition them to change the laws?

      It’s aimed at us, the people getting fucked over, to point out what (among the many other things) we should be fighting for. Commentary like this is important to align the goals of the organizations, charities and lobby groups that defend YOUR civil rights by filing amicus briefs, publishing articles, encouraging activism and drives to get citizens to write to their representatives on the important matters that affect their rights. You don’t even have to do anything and there are thousands of people out there trying to protect you from getting more fucked by Big Tech and capitalism, on a volunteer basis.

      It sounds to me like you’ve just given up hope that any progress can be made on this front, given the new status quo.

      Never give up. Just because civil rights defenders will be on the defensive for a few years does not mean that discussions of what is worth defending no longer have value.

    • Kichae
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Heaven forbid someone point out the reasons things suck and the ways we could do thibgs different, even if you know no one’s going to change.

      Better to just shrug everything off and tell folks “that’s life, get used to it”, right? That does a lot of good!

    • displaced_city_mouse@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      the idea that these webs of laws or these models of “how things should work” mean anything tho the people with power are complete nonsense.

      Kinda ironic that you are discussing the nonsense of “how things should work” on a federated service where you control the intermediaries you work with and through, which is, IMO, the way things should work.

    • Em Adespoton
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      The problem is, once the middlemen gain power, they’re never gonna give you up. Music producers are a great example of this, as are telecoms companies.

      All the current SaaS stuff is similar; the offerings LOOK similar, but they’re explicitly designed not to be a 1:1 match, so you can’t just take your business elsewhere, just like the mattress companies of old.

      We’re even seeing this play out in the streaming video market, where each player has its own differentiator, moreso than we ever saw with traditional cable TV.

      Standards are great, but middlemen have no incentives to not subvert them.