• Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If execs want to reduce workforce size they should offer voluntary layoffs. Ya know, unless they’re scared of too many people leaving or something

    • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If they lay off employees, they have to pay severance and/or unemployment. If the employees quit due to unreasonable mandates, they can be fired with “cause”.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Voluntary layoffs - probably the best form of layoffs if you ask me - still come with severance packages that have to be paid. Very few people will be interested in quitting just because you ask them, but a good many will do it if you sweeten the deal.

      Basically we have 3 variants here:

      Regular layoffs - have to pay severance + can select who leaves RTO stealth layoffs - don’t have to pay severance + can’t select who leaves Voluntary layoffs - have to pay severance + can’t select who leaves

      Any morally bankrupt business would of course want a fourth variant where they get to select who leaves and don’t have to pay severance, but thankfully this option is generally not available to them.

      Anyway, voluntary layoffs are the best out of a selection of bad choices for the workers, but come with the most downsides for the morally bankrupt business.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They also want to get rid of long-time, well paid staff to hire replacements for way less.