• JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Oh.

    My minded automatically corrected that as “doubling from 15 to 30”. Because that’s what it needs to be, at least.

      • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I think the common sentiment is that minimum wage should be rated annually tied to a major factor on how much spending power that money has like inflation or productivity.

        Minimum wage started in 1938 at $0.25. if it kept up with inflation today that would be $5.59, which is far from enough to survive with even the most basic rent and groceries.

        “”" The dollar had an average inflation rate of 3.68% per year between 1938 and today, producing a cumulative price increase of 2,136.18%.“”"

        https://www.in2013dollars.com/us/inflation/1938?amount=0.25

        Productivity however has decoupled from wages decades ago, here’s the EPI graph most reference:

        If we re-coupled those values for minimum wage today that would be much higher. 3 years ago CBS reported it would be about $26: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/minimum-wage-26-dollars-economy-productivity/

        Where did that money go instead of paying fair wages?

      • celeste@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’m seeing 21.50 from articles in 2020 tying min wage to productivity. Maybe that’s the number basis? Or living wage? A living wage per state adjustment for one adult with one child seems to put lw around 30 in a lot of states, with the single adult needing 13-20.

        • Bananigans@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          All good possible points, but only one person in this thread can answer what the number basis is, so who knows.

      • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Because we’ve been arguing it should be at least 15 for 10 years, and inflation is a bitch and if federal minimum wage had tracked with inflation since it was implemented, it would be closer to 30 bucks an hour than to 15.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          And it should be all at once. The instant it’s passed, $30/hr. None of us got eased into it when gas prices and grocery prices and rent and health insurance went up.

        • Bananigans@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          I understand your sentiment, but if that’s your policy basis, you’d be asking for $10/hr instead of $15.

          Not necessarily a bad idea, I just wanted to know how that number was generated, because without that data, it’s not necessarily a good idea either.

            • Bananigans@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              7 hours ago

              If you read the comments, it’s actually not. Inflation alone doesn’t account for pinning wages near $30, so that’s not really a good explanation given that it’s nonfactual. Even if he’s considering the living wage instead of historical minimums, $30 is still about 30% higher than what an average living wage would be. Is there some other consideration he has that I’m missing? I wouldn’t know without asking due to an unfortunate lack of psychic powers.

              Anyways, sorry I asked for the policy reasoning behind a policy position. It clearly offended many, I realize my mistake, and won’t bring that kind of nonsense around here again.