• Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I know it’s an old joke but they really are considering it more of a Geneva Checklist, it seems.

      • acargitz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        If it’s dead and in Vietnam it’s Vietcong, amirite?

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That really depends on whose ambulance it is and how, exactly, it’s being used. If it’s specifically assigned to the military for casualty transport then it’s a target. But if it’s a civil service that’s just the closest response after a bombing then congratulations, you’ve committed a war crime by attacking it.

        Which is why other militaries go out of their way to make sure they aren’t targeting civil health infrastructure. Versus Israel who seems to be treating it like a target list. Again.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Got evidence that this actually happened?

        And to be clear, you don’t mean that they were transporting them away. To a hospital.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The Israeli military also claimed on Saturday, **without providing any evidence, **