• PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    The inscriptions were given the name of the Emperor to designate which year it was built or commissioned in - Romans didn’t use any sensible system regularly, like numbering the years from a set date. So, luckily for the stone carvers, the Emperor’s name didn’t ever need to be replaced.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh, I thought it was so that people who had been away would know if there was a new emperor lol. Better for history since it’s a clear record of what emperors ordered what roads built. Know what portion of them survived to modern times?

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Not sure. In places they were built over in the modern day, or repaired with modern techniques before “historical preservation” became a big thing, but there are a hell of a lot of them that still avoided those fates. Still-usable (for foot traffic) Roman roads positively litter Europe, even in Britain, which was the edge of the Empire. Thousands and thousands of miles’ worth.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      So, luckily for the stone carvers, the Emperor’s name didn’t ever need to be replaced.

      Removed, occasionally, but not replaced