• shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I actually ditched 2.4 gigahertz Wi-Fi on my home network entirely for this exact reason. If a device is not compatible with 5 gigahertz Wi-Fi, it doesn’t get purchased.

    • circuscritic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Do you live in a high density urban environment?

      Because if so, that totally makes sense, and the other benefit of 5GHz/6GHz not traveling too far outside your apartment or condo wall, is pretty nifty as well.

      But if you live in a house in the suburbs, man, that is commitment well outside of necessity, or convenience. Not saying it’s bad choice per se, just seems unnecessarily burdensome IMO.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I live in a single family house, but the area has quite a few single family houses packed pretty close together. So there’s still a lot of traffic on 2.4 GHz.

      • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        In my experience, having a vr setup with vive body trackers consumes the 2.4ghz band really fast; so there are still reasons to swap in the suburbs, but they’re more niche.

        Source: my PC is too far away from the router for wired, so it uses wifi. I had to switch to using 5ghz because my internet would drop out on 2.4ghz whenever I played VRChat.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It doesn’t just benefit you. You’re benefiting the current users of that spectrum that for one reason or another might not be able to switch.

      I suspect most users though couldn’t tell you what frequency their network uses let alone the devices on it.