• shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    3 months ago

    I actually ditched 2.4 gigahertz Wi-Fi on my home network entirely for this exact reason. If a device is not compatible with 5 gigahertz Wi-Fi, it doesn’t get purchased.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      3 months ago

      It doesn’t just benefit you. You’re benefiting the current users of that spectrum that for one reason or another might not be able to switch.

      I suspect most users though couldn’t tell you what frequency their network uses let alone the devices on it.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        Anyone with a NAS will immediately notice that they are on 2.4GHz because it will take several times longer to transfer files.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yup, I have one device that’s stuck on 2.4GHz, my Brother laser printer. It works fantastically otherwise and it has an Ethernet port, but I haven’t bothered to run cable yet to it. I suspect a lot of people have that one device they’d rather not replace, which is still on an old wifi standard.

        So I just make sure to have a simultaneous dual-band setup. Everything else uses 5GHz, and the 2.4GHz band exists for that one device, or if I’m on the opposite side of the house or something. I use fancy networking stuff though (Ubiquiti APs), your average person would just be confused at why the internet is sometimes slow (i.e. when the printer wakes up).

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          While my printer only supports 2.4GHz, it’s always been on Ethernet

          But too many smart home devices and media streamers, even after making an effort to stick with local IoT meshes.

    • circuscritic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 months ago

      Do you live in a high density urban environment?

      Because if so, that totally makes sense, and the other benefit of 5GHz/6GHz not traveling too far outside your apartment or condo wall, is pretty nifty as well.

      But if you live in a house in the suburbs, man, that is commitment well outside of necessity, or convenience. Not saying it’s bad choice per se, just seems unnecessarily burdensome IMO.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        I live in a single family house, but the area has quite a few single family houses packed pretty close together. So there’s still a lot of traffic on 2.4 GHz.

      • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        In my experience, having a vr setup with vive body trackers consumes the 2.4ghz band really fast; so there are still reasons to swap in the suburbs, but they’re more niche.

        Source: my PC is too far away from the router for wired, so it uses wifi. I had to switch to using 5ghz because my internet would drop out on 2.4ghz whenever I played VRChat.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m not OP, but I also live in a single family house in the suburbs and actively avoid 2.4-only gear. I do have one stubborn device on 2.4GHz though, my laser printer, so I have to keep buying simultaneous dual-band gear until I get around to running Ethernet cable to it.