I think we all owe The Marvels an apology…

  • ryan213
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    That’s surprising. First one was good.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      7 hours ago

      First one was depressing. Awfully depressing. It was poignant and well done but I can’t rewatch it because I have to gear up to be ready for it.

      The second one is a musical. I’m not sure anyone is ready for that after the first one.

      • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s weird. I watch the first Joker like three times so far. Haven’t seen the second. Now, Requiem for a Dream, that’s a hard watch for me.

        • lobut
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I put Requiem in the category movies of “Best Films I’ll Never See Again”. “The Skin I Live In” is in there too.

        • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Requiem is presented well, but I can’t get past the unrealistic situations they put the characters through, especially near the end.

    • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      First film was a great film if it were new IP, but a shit joker batman film. The second film was always likely to be shit, because they were always going for abstract and avant garde artistry without a clear connection to the underlying and far stronger story and IP people are expecting. I’m sure it’s a beautiful film and musical, but it’s dog shit attached to joker.

      • ryan213
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I didn’t even view the first as anything related to Batman. Just a standalone movie to me.

        • lobut
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I think a lot of the Batman connections were completely unnecessary and felt jarring. There weren’t that many and they were brief but I just wish they weren’t there at all. It’s a great film flaws and all to me.

        • keyez@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          That’s what it was supposed to be, a gritty disconnected story about what a more realistic take on a joker would be, don’t think batman or super heroes was supposed to be in either one, not sure where that commenter is coming from.

          • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            There is Bruce Wayne in the first one. He is the rich guy the main character meets in the public toilets then go stalk at his house.

            • keyez@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Bruce and Thomas Wayne were in the movies yes, they are part of that universe but it is not a superhero batman film or in that universe which is what I had mentioned

              • CaliforniaSober
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                21 minutes ago

                But that’s not the point.

                Batman is a presence. The Wayne’s as a story element, they are supposed to be moral & ethical pillars. Solid truth. Batman does not kill and preserves an ethical truth.

                All while the joker is a shifting description… an unreliable narrator. not a pillar not anything solid or true. The villains can shift and don’t have to hold true to anything. The killing joke is all about the lie and shifting excuses…

                The movie may suck but a shifty joker hasn’t traditionally been the reason.