• grteOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    My guess is they will excuse gas power generation if carbon capture technologies are used… Too bad carbon capture is bullshit.

    • inasaba@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The first time I read about CCS I actually laughed out loud. Somehow I’d assumed it would make some kind of usable carbon that we could bury to augment soil, but no. They’re literally catching ~30% of the CO2 gas from an industry’s tailpipe and putting the gas underground in an “airtight” chamber.

      Like, are you kidding me?

      • zephyreks
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a practical stopgap measure tbh. CCS is cheap

        • inasaba@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It just doesn’t do much of anything. We’re not going to reverse, or even halt climate change with it. For any industry that cannot be made green that has to continue in the future, we should obviously do it, but the claims about it by the fossil fuel industry are severely overinflated.

          • zephyreks
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fossil fuels are too important for both our economy and for basic goods (plastics…) to be eliminated.

            • inasaba@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Honestly, fuck the economy. Areas dependent on fossil fuels should have h started diversifying decades ago, but they stubbornly refused to — and continue to do so — to their own detriment. We’ve known for a long time that being entirely dependent on a single natural resource for the bulk of our jobs and trade was a bad idea: just look at the mill towns in BC when their mills closed. At how devastating the softwood lumber disputes were. It was pure hubris for provincial and local governments to push forward with continued dependence on single resource economies.

              I agree that we’ll never entirely end fossil fuel use because plastics are an amazing material, but I absolutely do not agree that we need to continue fossil fuel extraction for the sake of the “economy.” This is shortsighted thinking: the “economy” will be destroyed in the longterm by climate change. Natural disasters, human displacement, crop failures, water shortages, wildfires, the list goes on and on.