Elon Musk fought the law. The law appears to have won.

X, Musk’s social media platform, has backed down in its fight with the Brazilian judiciary, after complying with court orders that had blocked users in the country from accessing X.

The platform bowed to one of the key demands made by Brazil’s supreme court by appointing a legal representative in the country. It also paid outstanding fines and took down user accounts that the court had ordered to be removed on the basis that they threatened the country’s democracy, the New York Times reported.

However, the battle is not quite over. The supreme court said X had not filed the proper documentation showing that it had appointed Rachel de Oliveira Conceicao as its Brazilian representative. It gave the company five days to present documents validating her appointment.

  • Cyborganism
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    You know, Elon is not the one really dealing with this. It’s still employees.

    Not defending Elon or X here though. They got what they deserved.

    I wonder what goes through his employees’ heads who are still working there. Do they still even believe in the service??? Do they support their boss?

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Pretty sure anyone that’s left are the guys that bought into the Elon mystique, so they sort of got what they signed up for.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Or they have visas that don’t let them quit, or well let’s be honest, Musk is not special, doesn’t really matter which psychopath you’re working for. He’s just loud.

        • Cyborganism
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Ah that’s a good point that I didn’t think about.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Exactly. When it’s a choice between a decently-paying IT job for a shitty company in the U.S. or living in poverty in Mumbai, I don’t blame any of them for sticking with the job.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 hours ago

              I can’t answer that. I wasn’t being arbitrary apart from arbitrarily picking a city in India. A large number of H1-B visa holders who work at Twitter come from India.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        If not… maybe they’re being compensated accordingly. We can hope.

        So if you’re a hiring manager and someone has experience working for him but doesn’t fawn over him, maybe you give them some serious credit and figure they were probably decent at their job plus they can work with anybody.

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      15 hours ago

      They collect their paychecks and hope they never have to deal with him on any personal basis. It’s not too dissimilar from most jobs in that regard, but these were all once companies that employees might have put extra pride/effort into in the past. Doubtful much of that enthusiasm remains under these guy.

      • Cyborganism
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The guy’s about to be the world’s first trillionaire, from what I hear. I don’t think he really cares.