Hey all, this isn’t a post to complain about the limit but rather a prompt for discussion.

I ran into the post limit today when throwing some content up. I completely understand the need for a limit, otherwise you could have bots posting shit all over the place. But, it is a bit frustrating for a use case like mine.

I often, after work is done for the day, sit on my back patio and go through my RSS reader to get the daily news. I decided that when I found an article worth sharing I would throw it up on lemmy. I really like this site after coming from reddit. But it feels as though, with the current smaller user base, that there simply isn’t a lot of engagement due to the trickle of content currently. I was worried about people thinking I was “spamming”, but figured the increase of content would be worth the risk of a slap on the wrist. Thus, my burst of posting hit the 5 per hour limit.

I’m wondering if it’s possible to set certain users with an elevated set of permissions that would allow someone to go from a limit of 5 per hour to something like X posts per day. These individuals can be thought of as “ambassadors”, or something more accurate because I can’t think of a good name right now. Basically, individuals who have shown not to abuse the system, and in return can provide more content to the site.

I understand that the bursty nature of my posting is a bit of an edge case, but thought it was worth discussing. It would be nice if I didn’t have to save a bunch of articles and come back every hour to post 5 at a time :)

  • AccessViolation_@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 years ago

    This got me thinking. Maybe the post limit should be systematically applied to users if certain conditions are met. For example:

    If a user posts more than X times an hour, and most posts have a negative score, apply a limit of 5 posts an hour that last for a certain amount of time.

    If a system like this is ever to be implemented, I personally think it should be 100% automatic, with no exceptions. Once humans get to decide what’s potentially spam or not, you could run into issues.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 years ago

      I’m trying to avoid any “reputation-based” system in lemmy, not just for this one specifically, but for things in general. I don’t want what happened to stackoverflow and wikipedia, to happen here for example.

      • Maya@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 years ago

        Fair enough. Someday the psychohistorians will study what karma did to the brain…